No superintendent or individual at the state department of education has the power to change our budget situation. And, in an increasingly centralized education system, we have little power to redirect our time and attention to teaching and learning from the hours spent in a computer lab completing required state tests.
In Finland, I am trying to figure out how they balance it all. Look at exhibit 1, a table of per pupil expenditures in relation to scores on the PISA. (The PISA is the "Programme for International Student Assessment," the core measurement tool used to compare student performance across industrialized countries. It is developed by the OECD for the purposes of member countries.)

It case you can't read it, the U.S. spends 43% more on each pupil than Finland does. But Finnish students scored an average of 61 points higher than American students did on the PISA math assessment.
How can I reconcile this lower price tag with what I have seen in schools so far? These are beautiful buildings, with ample classroom space, labs, workshops; a wide-array of curricular options, low(er) teacher/student ratios, and well-paid, well-respected teachers. The atmosphere in a Finnish school is not one of rushing about getting from one place to the next, constant assessment, and exhausting schedules. Teachers work hard, but they and their students are much more relaxed.
And teacher/student contact hours are half of what they are in the U.S.? How can this be?
I have my work cut out for me.